How is is that one of new London freesheets, The London Paper, can run a decent squash article twice in a week while the national press buries the British Nationals in miniscule "sports round-up" results columns?
The newbie tabloid (carpeting the capital's pavements from 5pm daily) decided to feature Adrian Grant (pictured) - firstly highlighting the prospects of the Lewisham-born squash player, and then informing readers of his progression to the semi-finals, where he lost to the eventual runner-up of the tournament, John White.
Monday's Guardian didn't even carry the results from the finals, only the semis. A thumb though the Telegraph found the results mentioned in brief.
It's a shame I didn't pick a copy of the Manchester Evening News to review their coverage; it seems that the local press is far more interested in squash than national newspapers.
Hot topics
Media coverage | Men's game | Women's game | Governing bodies | Provision | Participation | Technology | Marketing | Image | Prize money | Partnerships and sponsorship | Popularity | Developing countries | Juniors | Officiation | Tournaments |
Olympics
Most popular | Canary Wharf 2009 | squashblog is 2 | Nick & Jenny in the mirror | What's rocking squash?
Most popular | Canary Wharf 2009 | squashblog is 2 | Nick & Jenny in the mirror | What's rocking squash?
Wednesday 21 February 2007
The London Paper 2 National Press 0
Posted by squashblogger at 23:52
Topics: media coverage, tournament
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment anonymously or leave your name.
Care about the future of squash? Get it off your chest ...