In an article I wrote a while back I asked readers to comment on the popularity of the women's game.
Lack of spectators is obviously not a probem in Kuala Lumpur, where the prize fund for the KL Open 2007 WISPA event was $44k, compared to $40k for the men.
This may be down to the participation of world champion Nicol David, a big star in her home country of Malaysia and the eventual winner of the tournament, beating Australia's Natalie Grinham in the final.
The fact that the women's prize fund exceeded the men's suggest that it is player marketability, and not the more well-worn factors such as game length or greater fitness, that determines who should be paid more in a particular event.
Have your say:
How strong is the women's game?
Hot topics
Media coverage | Men's game | Women's game | Governing bodies | Provision | Participation | Technology | Marketing | Image | Prize money | Partnerships and sponsorship | Popularity | Developing countries | Juniors | Officiation | Tournaments |
Olympics
Most popular | Canary Wharf 2009 | squashblog is 2 | Nick & Jenny in the mirror | What's rocking squash?
Most popular | Canary Wharf 2009 | squashblog is 2 | Nick & Jenny in the mirror | What's rocking squash?
Saturday 10 March 2007
Women on top with KL prize purse
Posted by squashblogger at 18:32
Topics: prize money, women's game
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to comment anonymously or leave your name.
Care about the future of squash? Get it off your chest ...